100% Pass Quiz 2025 Latest PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN: Valid PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Test Voucher

These formats hold high demand in the market and offer a great solution for quick and complete PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam preparation. These formats are PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN PDF dumps, web-based practice test software, and desktop practice test software. All these three PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN) exam questions contain the real, valid, and updated PECB Exams that will provide you with everything that you need to learn, prepare and pass the challenging but career advancement ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN certification exam with good scores.

In order to ensure the quality of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN actual exam, we have made a lot of efforts. Our company spent a great deal of money on hiring hundreds of experts and they formed a team to write the work. The qualifications of these experts are very high. They have rich knowledge and rich experience on ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study guide. These experts spent a lot of time before the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Study Materials officially met with everyone. And we have made scientific arrangements for the content of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN actual exam. You will be able to pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam with our excellent ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions.

>> Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Voucher <<

Free PDF Quiz 2025 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Useful Valid Test Voucher

By keeping customer satisfaction in mind, Pass4sures offers you a free demo of the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN) exam questions. As a result, it helps you to evaluate the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN) exam dumps before making a purchase. Pass4sures is steadfast in its commitment to helping you pass the PECB in ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam. A full refund guarantee (terms and conditions apply) offered by Pass4sures will save you from fear of money loss.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Sample Questions (Q116-Q121):

NEW QUESTION # 116
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核員，在一家提供 ICT 回收服務的組織中進行第三方監督審核。公司不再需要的ICT設備由組織處理。它要么被重新調試並重複使用，要么被安全地銷毀。
您注意到房間角落的長凳上有兩台伺服器。兩者的項目上都貼有伺服器名稱、IP 位址和管理員密碼的貼圖。您向 ICT 經理詢問這些物品，他告訴您這些物品是昨天從一位老客戶那裡收到的一批貨物的一部分。
您應該採取哪一項行動？

A. 要求被審核方移除標籤，然後繼續審核
B. 針對控制措施 8.20「網路安全」提出不符合項（應保護、管理和控製網路和網路設備，以保護系統和應用程式中的資訊）
C. 記錄您在審核結果中看到的內容，但不採取進一步行動
D. 注意審核結果並檢查處理與客戶 IT 安全相關的進貨的流程
E. 請 ICT 經理記錄資訊安全事件並啟動資訊安全事件管理流程
F. 針對控制提出不符合項 5.31 法律、法規、監管和合約要求'

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 8.1.4, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to information security with external providers, such as customers who send ICT equipment for reclamation12 In this case, the organisation offers ICT reclamation services, which involves processing customer ICT equipment that may contain sensitive or confidential information. The organisation should have a process in place to ensure that the customer ICT equipment is handled securely and in accordance with the customer's information security requirements. The process should include steps such as verifying the customer's identity and authorisation, checking the inventory and condition of the equipment, removing or destroying any labels or stickers that contain information about the equipment or the customer, wiping or erasing any data stored on the equipment, and documenting the actions taken and the results achieved12 The fact that the auditor noticed two servers on a bench with stickers that reveal the server's name, IP address and admin password indicates that the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security is not effective or not followed. This could pose a risk of unauthorised access, disclosure, or modification of the customer's information or systems. Therefore, the auditor should note the audit finding and check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:202212 The other actions are not appropriate for the following reasons:
* A. Asking the ICT Manager to record an information security incident and initiate the information security incident management process is not appropriate because this is not an information security incident that affects the organisation's own information or systems. An information security incident is defined as a single or a series of unwanted or unexpected information security events that have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security12 In this case, the information security event affects the customer's information or systems, not the organisation's. Therefore, the organisation should follow the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, not the process for information security incident management.
* C. Recording what the auditor has seen in the audit findings, but taking no further action is not appropriate because this would not address the root cause or the impact of the issue. The auditor has a responsibility to verify the effectiveness and compliance of the organisation's information security management system, and to report any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement12 Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* D. Raising a nonconformity against control 5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements is not appropriate because this control is not relevant to the issue. Control 5.31 requires the organisation to identify and comply with the legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements that are applicable to the information security management system12 In this case, the issue is not about the organisation's compliance with the legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements, but about the organisation's control of the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system. Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* E. Raising a nonconformity against control 8.20 'network security' (networks and network devices shall be secured, managed and controlled to protect information in systems and applications) is not appropriate because this control is not relevant to the issue. Control 8.20 requires the organisation to secure, manage and control its own networks and network devices to protect the information in its systems and applications12 In this case, the issue is not about the organisation's network security, but about the organisation's control of the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system. Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* F. Asking the auditee to remove the labels, then carry on with the audit is not appropriate because this would not address the root cause or the impact of the issue. The auditor should not interfere with the auditee's operations or suggest corrective actions during the audit, as this would compromise the auditor's objectivity and impartiality12 The auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause
8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2

NEW QUESTION # 117
當審核團隊的另一位成員向您尋求澄清時，您正在進行第三方監督審核。他們被要求評估組織對控制 5.7 - 威脅情報的應用。他們知道這是 2022 年版 ISO/IEC 中引入的新控制措施之一
27001，他們希望確保正確審核控制。
他們準備了一份清單來協助他們進行審核，並希望您確認他們計劃的活動符合控制要求。
下列哪三個選項代表有效的審計追蹤？

A. 我將確保採取適當措施，向最高管理階層通報目前威脅情報安排的有效性
B. 我將回顧如何收集和評估與資訊安全威脅相關的資訊以產生威脅情報
C. 我將檢查該組織是否擁有完整記錄的威脅情報流程
D. 我將與高階主管交談，以確保所有員工都意識到報告威脅的重要性
E. 我將確保組織的風險評估流程從有效的威脅情報開始
F. 我將確定在威脅情報的生成中是否使用內部和外部資訊來源
G. 我將確保將產生威脅情報的任務分配給組織的內部稽核團隊
H. 我將檢查是否積極使用威脅情報來保護組織資訊資產的機密性、完整性和可用性

Answer: A,B,H

Explanation:
These three options represent valid audit trails for control 5.7, as they are aligned with the control's requirements and objectives. According to the web search results from my predefined tool, control 5.7 requires organisations to collect and analyse information relating to information security threats and use that information to take mitigation actions12. The control also specifies that threat intelligence should be relevant, perceptive, contextual, and actionable, and that it should be used to prevent, detect, or respond to threats34. Therefore, the auditor should verify how the organisation collects, analyses, and produces threat intelligence, how it uses threat intelligence to protect its information assets, and how it monitors and evaluates the effectiveness of its threat intelligence arrangements. The other options are not valid audit trails, as they are either irrelevant, incorrect, or incomplete. For example:
* The task of producing threat intelligence is not assigned to the organisation's internal audit team, but to the person or team responsible for the ISMS, such as the information security manager or the information security committee5 .
* The organisation's risk assessment process does not begin with effective threat intelligence, but with the identification of the context, scope, and objectives of the ISMS . Threat intelligence is an input for the risk identification and analysis, but not the starting point of the risk assessment process.
* Speaking to top management to make sure all staff are aware of the importance of reporting threats is not sufficient to audit the control, as it does not address how the organisation collects, analyses, and produces threat intelligence, nor how it uses it to take mitigation actions. The auditor should also speak to the staff involved in the threat intelligence process, and review the relevant documents and records.
* Checking that the organisation has a fully documented threat intelligence process is not enough to audit the control, as it does not verify the implementation and effectiveness of the process. The auditor should also observe the process in action, and examine the outputs and outcomes of the process.
* Determining whether internal and external sources of information are used in the production of threat intelligence is a partial audit trail, as it only covers one aspect of the control. The auditor should also assess the quality, reliability, and relevance of the sources, and how the information is analysed and used.

NEW QUESTION # 118
您正在一家提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。審核計畫的下一步是驗證資訊安全事件管理流程。 IT 安全經理介紹了資訊安全事件管理程序，並解釋該流程基於 ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016。
您查看該文件並注意到一條聲明「任何資訊安全弱點、事件和事故應在識別後 1 小時內報告給聯絡人 (PoC)」。在訪問員工時，您發現大家對「弱點、事件、事件」意義的理解有差異。
您從事件追蹤系統中抽取過去 6 個月的事件報告記錄樣本，總結結果如下表所示。

您想進一步調查其他領域以收集更多審計證據。選擇兩個不會出現在您的審核追蹤中的選項。

A. 透過訪問更多員工了解他們對報告流程的理解來收集更多證據。
（與控制措施 A.6.8 相關）
B. 收集更多有關人力資源經理如何以及何時支付贖金以解鎖個人行動資料（即信用卡和銀行轉帳）的證據。（與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
C. 收集更多關於公司如何以及何時支付贖金以解鎖公司手機和資料（即信用卡和銀行轉帳）的證據。（與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
D. 收集更多證據，說明組織如何確定事件發生後無需採取進一步行動。（與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
E. 收集更多有關組織如何確定事件恢復時間的證據。（與控制措施 A.5.27 相關）
F. 收集更多有關事件恢復程序的證據。（與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
*C. Collect more evidence on how and when the Human Resources manager pays the ransom fee to unlock personal mobile data, i.e., credit card, and bank transfer. (Relevant to control A.5.26) This is not relevant to the audit of the organization's incident management process. The HR manager's personal phone and how they handle a ransomware attack on it falls outside the scope of the ISMS audit. The organization is not responsible for personal devices.
*B. Collect more evidence on how and when the company pays the ransom fee to unlock the company's mobile phone and data, i.e., credit card, and bank transfer. (Relevant to control A.5.26) While seemingly relevant, this focuses on the method of payment for the ransom. The core issue is the organization paying the ransom at all, which is generally not best practice in incident response. The audit should focus on why this decision was made and if alternative solutions were considered (e.g., data backups, device wiping and restoration).
Why the other options ARE relevant:
*A. Collect more evidence by interviewing more staff about their understanding of the reporting process.
(Relevant to control A.6.8) This directly addresses the identified discrepancy in understanding "weakness, event, and incident," which is crucial for proper incident reporting.
*D. Collect more evidence on how the organisation determined the incident recovery time. (Relevant to control A.5.27) This investigates the basis for the 24-hour recovery time, which seems arbitrary and may not be appropriate for all incidents.
*E. Collect more evidence on how the organization determined no further action was needed after the incident. (Relevant to control A.5.26) This probes the adequacy of the incident response, especially the lack of preventative measures after paying the ransom.
*F. Collect more evidence on the incident recovery procedures. (Relevant to control A.5.26) This examines the actual procedures to assess their effectiveness and alignment with best practices.

NEW QUESTION # 119
場景 1：Fintive 是一家傑出的線上支付和保護解決方案安全提供者。 Fintive 於 1999 年由 Thomas Fin 在加州聖荷西創立，為線上營運、希望提高資訊安全、防止詐欺並保護 PII 等用戶資訊的公司提供服務。 Fintive的決策和營運流程以以往的案例為中心。他們收集客戶數據，根據情況進行分類並進行分析。該公司需要大量員工才能進行如此複雜的分析。然而，幾年後，協助進行此類分析的技術也取得了進展。現在，Fintive 正計劃使用現代工具聊天機器人來實現模式分析，以即時防止詐騙。該工具也將用於幫助改善客戶服務。
這個最初的想法已傳達給軟體開發團隊，他們支持該想法並被分配從事該專案。他們開始將聊天機器人整合到現有系統中。此外，團隊也為聊天機器人設定了一個目標，即回答 85% 的聊天查詢。
聊天機器人成功整合後，該公司立即將其發布給客戶使用。
然而，聊天機器人似乎存在一些問題。
由於測試不足，並且在訓練階段缺乏向聊天機器人提供的樣本（在訓練階段，聊天機器人本應「學習」查詢模式），因此聊天機器人無法解決用戶查詢並提供正確的答案。此外，當聊天機器人收到無效輸入（例如奇怪的點圖案和特殊字元）時，它會向使用者發送隨機檔案。因此，聊天機器人無法正確回答客戶的查詢，而傳統的客戶支援因聊天查詢而不堪重負，因此無法幫助客戶解決他們的請求。
因此，Fintive 制定了軟體開發政策。該政策規定，無論軟體是內部開發還是外包，在作業系統上實施之前都將經過黑盒測試。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
在訓練階段測試不充分且缺乏向 Fintive 聊天機器人提供的樣本被視為 1。
參考場景

A. 風險
B. 威脅
C. 漏洞

Answer: C

NEW QUESTION # 120
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊負責人，負責對網路服務供應商進行第三方監督審核。您正在檢視組織的風險評估流程是否符合 ISO
/IEC 27001:2022。
以下哪三項審核結果會促使您提出不合格報告？

A. 組織已將其所有資訊安全風險的機率評估為 0%、25%、
50%、75% 或 100%
B. 組織尚未使用 RAG（紅色、琥珀色、綠色）對其資訊安全風險進行分類。
相反，它使用了微笑表情符號、中性表情符號和悲傷表情符號
C. 組織的風險評估標準尚未經過最高管理層的審查和批准
D. 組織的資訊安全風險評估流程建議為每個風險分配一個風險負責人
E. 組織的資訊安全風險評估流程僅基於對每個風險影響的評估
F. 兩個系統都包含與保護資訊的機密性、完整性和可存取性無關的額外資訊安全風險
G. 組織正在按照識別的順序處理資訊安全風險
H. 有不同的系統用於評估營運資訊安全風險和評估策略資訊安全風險

Answer: C,E,G

Explanation:
The three audit findings that would prompt you to raise a nonconformity report are:
*The organisation is treating information security risks in the order in which they are identified
*The organisation's risk assessment criteria have not been reviewed and approved by top management
*The organisation's information security risk assessment process is based solely on an assessment of the impact of each risk According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.2, the organisation must establish and maintain an information security risk management process that is consistent with the organisation's context and aligned with its overall risk management approach1. This process must include the following steps:
*Establishing the risk assessment criteria, which must be approved by top management and reflect the organisation's risk appetite and objectives2
*Identifying the information security risks, which must consider the assets, threats, vulnerabilities, impacts, and likelihoods3
*Analysing the information security risks, which must determine the levels of risk and compare them with the risk criteria4
*Evaluating the information security risks, which must prioritise the risks and decide whether they need treatment or not5 Therefore, the audit findings B, E, and F indicate that the organisation is not following the required steps of the information security risk management process, and thus are nonconformities with the standard.
The other audit findings are not necessarily nonconformities, as they may be acceptable depending on the organisation's context and justification. For example:
*Audit finding A may be acceptable if the organisation has identified and treated the additional information security risks that are relevant to its scope and objectives, and has documented the rationale for doing so6
*Audit finding C may be acceptable if the organisation has assigned clear roles and responsibilities for the information security risk management process, and has ensured that the risk owners have the authority and competence to manage the risks7
*Audit finding D may be acceptable if the organisation has defined and communicated the meaning and implications of the emoji-based risk classification, and has ensured that it is consistent with the risk criteria and the risk treatment process8
*Audit finding G may be acceptable if the organisation has justified the use of discrete values for the probability of the information security risks, and has ensured that they are realistic and consistent with the risk criteria and the risk analysis method9
*Audit finding H may be acceptable if the organisation has established and maintained different systems for assessing operational and strategic information security risks, and has ensured that they are integrated and aligned with the overall risk management approach and the ISMS objectives10 References: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2; 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 a); 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 b); 4: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 c); 5: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 d); 6: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.0.2; 7: ISO
/IEC 27001:2022, 5.3; 8: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 a) 2); 9: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.2 c) 2); 10: ISO/IEC
27001:2022, 6.1.2 a) 1); : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC
27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; :
ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022

NEW QUESTION # 121
......

Our products are officially certified, and our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam materials are definitely the most authoritative product in the industry. In order to ensure the authority of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN practice prep, our company has really taken many measures. We have hired the most professioal experts to compile the content of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study braindumps, and design the displays. So our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning questions can stand the test of the market.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Valid Real Exam: https://www.pass4sures.top/ISO-27001/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-testking-braindumps.html

So our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN test prep will not occupy too much time, PECB Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Voucher All study materials from our company are designed by a lot of experts and professors, PECB Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Voucher Firstly, high-quality products are of paramount importance, PECB Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Voucher People who can contact with your name, e-mail, telephone number are all members of the internal corporate, We try our best to provide the most efficient and intuitive ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning materials to the learners and help them learn efficiently.

Besides, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN pass4sure vce with brilliant reputation among the market have high quality and accuracy, so you can be confident with the quality of our products.

In addition, several people smarter then I have already written on the topic, So our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Prep will not occupy too much time, All study materials from our company are designed by a lot of experts and professors.

2025 Valid 100% Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN – 100% Free Valid Test Voucher | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Valid Real Exam

Firstly, high-quality products are of paramount importance, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN People who can contact with your name, e-mail, telephone number are all members of the internal corporate.

We try our best to provide the most efficient and intuitive ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning materials to the learners and help them learn efficiently.

Gus Lee Gus Lee

Biography

100% Pass Quiz 2025 Latest PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN: Valid PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Test Voucher

Free PDF Quiz 2025 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Useful Valid Test Voucher

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Sample Questions (Q116-Q121):

2025 Valid 100% Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN – 100% Free Valid Test Voucher | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Valid Real Exam

saranyanarayanamoorthy

GET CONNECTED!